Apocryphicity

The programme for the 2011 Réunion de l'AELAC, which takes place June 30-July 2 in Dole, has been posted on-line (available HERE).These are the titles of the papers announced thus far:

Anne-Marie Polo de Beaulieu, “Usages et fonctions des apocryphes dans les recueils d'exempla et la prédication aux XIII^e-XIV^e siècles.”

Brent Landau, “Revelation of the Magi.”  

Yves Tissot, “Évaluation critique de l'édition des Actes de Thomas de M. Bonnet."

Kristian Heal, “The Syriac History of Joseph.”  

Tony Burke, “New Developments in Constructing a Critical Edition of the Syriac Infancy Gospel of Thomas.”

Witold Witakowski, “The ‘Vienna Protology’ and recently discovered paintings in a church in northern Ethiopia based on this Ethiopic apocryphal text.”

L’édition de textes à traditions multiples : approches théoriques et pratiques avec les interventions de:

Els Rose, “L’édition des Virtutes apostolorum.”

Zbigniew Izydorczyk, “Excer[-or-]cizing uncertainty: reflections on editing the Evangelium Nicodemi.”

Bart Janssens, “Les séries latines de Brepols et les outils électroniques.”

Caroline Mace, “La série grecque du CC et le logiciel Classical Text Editor.”

And here is the abstract for my paper:

“New Developments in Constructing a Critical Edition of the Syriac Infancy Gospel of Thomas”

The Infancy Gospel of Thomas (IGT) is one of the most ancient texts of the Christian Apocrypha, dating perhaps to the early second century.  Though scholarship on IGT has been sparse for decades, the past ten years has seen a surge in interest in this text. Several major studies have appeared including my recently released critical edition of the IGT’s Greek manuscript tradition (De infantia Iesu Euangelium Thomae Graece. Corpus Christianorum Series Apocryphorum 17. Turnhout: Brepols, 2010). Despite the importance of the Greek tradition, it has long been recognized that some of the early versions of IGT—Syriac, Latin, Georgian, and Ethiopic—represent an earlier form of the text. The most important of these versions is the Syriac, of which there are manuscripts dating to the fifth century—six centuries older than the earliest Greek manuscript. This paper describes all of the known Syriac manuscripts of IGT and arranges them into three recensions: Sa, which includes the two previously-published but fragmentary fifth-century manuscripts along with two later but complete witnesses; Sw, the west Syrian (or “Jacobite”) form of the text extant in twelve unpublished manuscripts; and Se, the east Syrian (or “Nestorian”) version found in three manuscripts of the Life of the Virgin Mary, which was published from one of these witnesses by E. A. Wallis Budge in 1899. A critical edition of the Syriac IGT is long overdue and will be of great benefit to the study of this important text.

The 2010 réunion annuelle de l’Association pour l’étude de la literature apocryphe chrétienne (AELAC) takes place June 24-26th. Here are the papers to be presented:

Jane Baun, “The Apocalypse of the Theotokos: Some Avenues of Approach.”

Christoph Markschies, "Das Evangelium der 12 Apostel. Beobachtungen im Rahmen der Arbeit am neuen Hennecke zu diesem und zuanderen apokryph gewordenen Texten.”

Alessandro Bausi, “Les listes des apôtres et disciples en éthiopien.”

Nicole Volmering, “The Seven Heavens in the Old English Tradition.”

Caitríona Ó Dochartaigh, “The Relationship between the Tenga Bithnua and the Irish Seven Heavens Texts.”

Charlotte Touati, “Les sept cieux de l'ascète. Témoignages égyptiens du IIIe s. ap. J.-C.”

Christophe Guignard, “Les listes grecques d’apôtres et de disciples”

André Gagné, “Jésus, la lumière et le Père vivant (EvTh 15; 50; 77). Existe-t-il des traces d'une christologie modaliste dans l’Évangile selon Thomas?”

Sever Voicu, “A popos de la tradition latine des Paidika Iesou.”

Valentina Calzolari, “Les Actes de Thècle arméniens.”

This year’s AELAC (Association pour l’étude de la literature apocryphe chrétienne) réunion took place in Dole, France June 26-28. The association was formed by French and Swiss scholars in 1981 and is responsible for a well-regarded line of critical editions (Corpus Christianorum, Series Apocryphorum), the journal Apocrypha, the Pleiades Apocrypha Collection Études apocryphes chrétiens, and a series of French pocketbook editions of individual texts (La collection de poche apocryphes). The membership of the group has become increasingly international over the years and now includes scholars from across Europe, Russia, and North America. The annual meetings are wonderful opportunities to meet scholars in the field, engage in collaborative endeavours, and hear about new developments in the study of the texts.

Many of the presenters this year were North American, which was somewhat comforting to those of us who do not speak French. Several of the papers dealt with narratives of Jesus’ childhood and infancy, a topic of particular interest to me. Here are some of the highlights of the réunion.

Andrei Vinogradov presented a study of the Acts of Andrew and Matthaias. What was interesting from my perspective was that he informed me later of a Russian manuscript of the text which features a recital of events from Jesus’ life including four stories from the Infancy Gospel of Thomas. He promised to send me a copy of his edition of the manuscript. I look forward to seeing where it fits into the Greek tradition of the text.

Reidar Aasgaard presented a summary of his stance on Infancy Thomas from his forthcoming monograph, The Childhood of Jesus: Decoding the Apocryphal Infancy Gospel of Thomas. The paper, called “Hearing With Children: The Infancy Gospel of Thomas as Evidence of Children’s Culture in Late Antique Rural Christianity”, argues “that the Infancy Gospel of Thomas had its Sitz em Leben within a rural middle/lower class village milieu…and that a main audience for the story was early Christian children.” Many of the participants of the reunion took issue with his two arguments, but his paper began a discussion of the text that continued for the next two days. In attendance also was Sever Voicu, who has contributed significantly to scholarship on Infancy Thomas.  He objected sternly to Reidar’s choice of manuscript base for his study: the unpublished 11th-century Sabaiticus 259, a Greek manuscript I also believe to be important.

My paper came next. I contributed a discussion, edition, and translation of Infancy Thomas from Vaticanus Syriacus 159, a manuscript used almost a century ago by Paul Peeters but never published. Again, a valuable discussion followed, though focused more on wider issues relating to Infancy Thomas than the Syriac text in particular.

Stephen Shoemaker followed with his paper, “A New Dormition Fragment in Coptic: P. Vindob K7589 and the Marian Apocryphal Tradition.” This fragment was published by Hans Förster in 2006, at which time he claimed it to be a witness to the earliest form of the Dormition (ca. mid to late second-century). This is a tantalizing prospect but, alas, Stephen proved convincingly that the ninth-century fragment instead “once belonged to an early medieval liturgy collection.”

Two additional papers continued the theme of apocryphal infancy traditions. Cornelia Horn presented on “Syriac and Arabic Perspectives on Jesus’ Childhood: The Book of Mary, the Arabic Apocryphal Gospel of John, and the Rise of Islam.” And Brent Landau shared with us a summary of his doctoral work on a text he calls The Revelation of the Magi which presents itself as the personal testimony of the Magi who visited Jesus in his infancy.

All-in-all, the réunion was fruitful both for the opportunity to discuss work with partners in our field and for the chance to gather with old and new friends.

The program for this year’s réunion annuelle de l’AELAC (Association pour l’étude de la littérature apocryphe chrétienne) taking place June 26-28 has been posted on the association’s web site. You can access it HERE.