<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Jesus Tomb and the Acts of Philip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.TonyBurke.ca/apocryphicity/2007/02/26/the-jesus-tomb-and-the-acts-of-philip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.TonyBurke.ca/apocryphicity/2007/02/26/the-jesus-tomb-and-the-acts-of-philip/</link>
	<description>A weblog devoted to the study of the Christian Apocrypha</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apocryphicity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Jesus Tomb and the Acts of Philip II</title>
		<link>http://www.TonyBurke.ca/apocryphicity/2007/02/26/the-jesus-tomb-and-the-acts-of-philip/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Apocryphicity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Jesus Tomb and the Acts of Philip II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.TonyBurke.ca/apocryphicity/2007/02/26/the-jesus-tomb-and-the-acts-of-philip/#comment-374</guid>
		<description>[...] The excerpt from the Acts I posted (HERE), in which the only Mariamne identified is Mary of Bethany and sister of Philip, is from M. R. James&#8217; edition. I do not have Bovon&#8217;s at hand but can anyone clarify this? Are both the Post and Jacobovici misrepresenting the text? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The excerpt from the Acts I posted (HERE), in which the only Mariamne identified is Mary of Bethany and sister of Philip, is from M. R. James&rsquo; edition. I do not have Bovon&rsquo;s at hand but can anyone clarify this? Are both the Post and Jacobovici misrepresenting the text? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Codex: Biblical Studies Blogspot &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Jesus/Talpiot Tomb: Around the Blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://www.TonyBurke.ca/apocryphicity/2007/02/26/the-jesus-tomb-and-the-acts-of-philip/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Codex: Biblical Studies Blogspot &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Jesus/Talpiot Tomb: Around the Blogosphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 06:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.TonyBurke.ca/apocryphicity/2007/02/26/the-jesus-tomb-and-the-acts-of-philip/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>[...] Tony Burke has a short note on his Apocryphicity blog about the questionable appeal to the Acts of Philip to identify the ossuary of â€œMariamneâ€ with Mary Magdalene. Tony notes that one shouldn&#8217;t look to the Acts of Philip for reliable information about first-century figures and that the Mariamne referred to in the Acts of Philip is not Mary Magdalene, but Mary of Bethany. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tony Burke has a short note on his Apocryphicity blog about the questionable appeal to the Acts of Philip to identify the ossuary of â€œMariamneâ€ with Mary Magdalene. Tony notes that one shouldn&#8217;t look to the Acts of Philip for reliable information about first-century figures and that the Mariamne referred to in the Acts of Philip is not Mary Magdalene, but Mary of Bethany. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

